William Paley Institute
for
Intelligent Design

Home

Legal Cases

Back


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

393 U.S. 97

Epperson v. Arkansas


No. 7 Argued: October 16, 1968 --- Decided: November 12, 1968


Appellant Epperson, an Arkansas public school teacher, brought this action for
declaratory and injunctive relief challenging the constitutionality of Arkansas'
"anti-evolution" statute. That statute makes it unlawful for a teacher in any
state supported school or university to teach or to use a textbook that teaches
"that mankind ascended or descended from a lower order of animals." The State
Chancery Court held the statute an abridgment of free speech violating the First
and Fourteenth Amendments. The State Supreme Court, expressing no opinion as to
whether the statute prohibits "explanation" of the theory or only teaching that
the theory is true, reversed the Chancery Court. In a two-sentence opinion, it
sustained the statute as within the State's power to specify the public school
curriculum.

Held: The statute violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which embraces the First
Amendment's prohibition of state laws respecting an establishment of religion.
Pp. 102-109.

(a) The Court does not decide whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague,
since, whether it is construed to prohibit explaining the Darwinian theory or
teaching that it is true, the law conflicts with the Establishment Clause. Pp.
102-103.

(b) The sole reason for the Arkansas law is that a particular religious group
considers the evolution theory to conflict with the account of the origin of man
set forth in the Book of Genesis. Pp. 103, 107-109.

(c) The First Amendment mandates governmental neutrality between religion and
religion, and between religion and nonreligion. Pp. 103-107.

(d) A State's right to prescribe the public school curriculum does not include
the right to prohibit teaching a scientific theory or doctrine for reasons that
run counter to the principles of the First Amendment. P. 107.

(e) The Arkansas law is not a manifestation of religious neutrality. P. 109.
242 Ark. 922, 416 S.W.2d 322, reversed. [p98]

 

Promoting an Understanding of the Intelligent Design of the Universe