by Paul, Senator Simon



Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal
Senator Simon (D.-Ill.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, gives
an insider's account of the confirmation process for Supreme Court
nominees. He examines recent controversial confirmation hearings,
especially for Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork, and earlier confirmation
battles beginning with George Washington's administration. Simon offers
new information and a distinctive perspective on the Thomas hearings and
the Thomas-Hill confrontation. Arguing that the Senate should take its
"advice and consent" responsibilities seriously, he recommends that the
Senate should insure ideological diversity among Supreme Court nominees,
inquire closely into the nominee's substantive views, and use executive
sessions when nominees face serious charges. He also suggests that
presidents should seriously seek the advice and consent of the Senate
prior to nominating a justice. This thoughtful analysis is recommended for
legal and political collections.

From Book News, Inc.
US Senator Simon examines two recent Supreme Court nomination battles,
assesses their impact on government and politics, reviews the historical
context, and suggests some changes in the system. Available from National
Press Books, 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 212, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Annotation copyright Book News, Inc. Portland, Or.

Product Details

Hardcover: 328 pages
Publisher: National Press Books (June 1, 1992)
ISBN: 0915765985